HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Yoon, H. Articles by Werth, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Yoon, H. Articles by Werth, C. J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Yoon, H. Articles by Werth, C. J. Related Collections Coupled Flow/Transport Models Organic Compounds

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

Modeling the Influence of Water Content on Soil Vapor Extraction

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., MC-250, Urbana, IL 61801
^* Corresponding author (valocchi{at}uiuc.edu).

Received 14 November 2002.

We present a comprehensive model and simulation results to assess the impact of changing water content on nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) mass transfer, vapor phase retardation, and slow desorption during soil vapor extraction (SVE). Contaminant mass transfer and water and energy transport processes for a one-dimensional, nonisothermal, and single contaminant component system are considered. Literature-derived relationships are used to express the fraction of soil surface area exposed to the vapor phase and the NAPL–gas mass transfer rate expression as a function of water saturation. Simulations are presented for two scenarios: (i) low water saturation, where soil drying is expected and direct vapor sorption to soil may be important, and (ii) high water saturation, where NAPL mass transfer to the gas phase is rate-limited and the gas flow rate is very low. At low water saturation slow desorption controls long tailing in the effluent concentration and the cleanup time. Also, when dry air is purged through the system, water evaporation occurs, the temperature decreases, and hence, desorption rates decrease. The NAPL mass transfer rates were negligibly affected by water evaporation because time scales of the NAPL volatilization were much smaller than time scales of the water evaporation. At high water saturation, NAPL is trapped by water and NAPL mass transfer to the gas phase is limited by diffusion through water films. For this case, NAPL mass transfer is slow and thus controls concentration tailing and cleanup times.

Abbreviations: NAPL, nonaqueous phase liquid • RH, relative humidity • SVE, soil vapor extraction • TCE, trichloroethylene • VOC, volatile organic chemical

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. D. Akinyemi, N. Mendes, M. Jonsson, J. Meissner, and S. De Linhares Effects of Psychrometrics Conditions on the Drying of a Porous Soil Journal of Building Physics, July 1, 2007; 31(1): 73 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Oostrom, J. H. Dane, and T. W. Wietsma Removal of Carbon Tetrachloride from a Layered Porous Medium by Means of Soil Vapor Extraction Enhanced by Desiccation and Water Table Reduction Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1170 - 1182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Guillen and R. C. Hertzog A Survey of Department of Energy-Sponsored Geophysical Research for Shallow Waste Site Characterization Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2004; 3(1): 122 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]