HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fujimaki, H. Articles by Inoue, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Fujimaki, H. Articles by Inoue, M. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Fujimaki, H. Articles by Inoue, M. Related Collections Hydraulic Conductivity/Relative Permeability Water Retention/Capillary Pressure Evapotranspiration Models

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER

A Transient Evaporation Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties at Low Pressure

^a Institute of Agricultural and Forest Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennohdai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
^b Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, Japan
^* Corresponding author (fujimaki{at}sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp).

Received 10 December 2002.

A two-stage laboratory method is presented for rapid estimation of the soil water retention function () and the hydraulic conductivity function K() from near saturation to air dry. The pressure head, h, at the bottom of an initially saturated soil core was stepwise decreased whenever the outflow rate had essentially ceased. After attaining this near-equilibrium at = -160 cm, the bottom boundary was sealed, the soil surface was uncovered, and the evaporation rate at a controlled constant temperature was measured. The () was determined by curve-fitting of the equilibrium outflow and psychrometric data obtained from soil samples after evaporation, while the K() was estimated inversely using cumulative evaporation amounts and the final water content profile. The simulated cumulative evaporation and final water content profiles from the optimized parameter values agreed well with the measured data. The root mean square errors for evaporation and the final water content profile were less than 0.022 cm and 0.011, respectively. In addition to close agreement with the simulation, agreement with independent K() data obtained from a steady-state, direct method confirm the reliability of the method presented here.

Abbreviations: SDFM, steady-state downward flow method • SEM, steady-state evaporation experiment • TEM, transient evaporation method

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Fujimaki, T. Shimano, M. Inoue, and K. Nakane Effect of a Salt Crust on Evaporation from a Bare Saline Soil Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1246 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Ghezzehei, R. C. Trautz, S. Finsterle, P. J. Cook, and C. F. Ahlers Modeling Coupled Evaporation and Seepage in Ventilated Cavities Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 806 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]