HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ochsner, T. E. Articles by Ren, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ochsner, T. E. Articles by Ren, T. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Ochsner, T. E. Articles by Ren, T. Related Collections Soil Methods/Instrumentation Water Content Soil Hydrology

SPECIAL SECTION - ADVANCES IN MEASUREMENT AND MONITORING METHODS

Use of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Technique to Monitor Soil Water Content in the Vadose Zone

^a USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN 55108
^b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
^c Inst. of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 100101
^* Corresponding author (ochsner{at}umn.edu).

Received 14 March 2003.

The dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) technique is emerging as a useful technique for measuring soil volumetric water content (). However, few published data are available regarding the performance of the DPHP technique under field conditions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the DPHP technique for measuring under field conditions. We used 24 DPHP sensors to monitor in a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] field during the 2001 and 2002 growing seasons. The DPHP sensors demonstrated durability in field conditions and clear sensitivity to temporal and spatial variations of at the scale of measurement. The mean measured by the DPHP sensors (_DPHP) was on average 0.040 m³ m^-3 larger than the mean measured by soil sampling (_SS). The response of the DPHP sensors was linear. Regressions of _DPHP vs. _SS yielded r² values of 0.949 and 0.843 at depths of 7.5 and 37.5 cm. The DPHP technique showed good resolution with RMSE values for the regression of 0.009 and 0.011 m³ m^-3 at the two measurement depths. The slopes of the regressions were 0.75 rather than 1.0. Errors in _SS are a likely cause of this low slope. We shifted all the values for each sensor up or down by a constant value to make the first measurement from each sensor equal determined from soil sampling near that sensor at the time of installation. This simple matching point procedure improved the accuracy of the DPHP technique, resulting in a -0.024 m³ m^-3 average difference between _DPHP and _SS. Also, the matching point procedure markedly reduced the variability between sensors, reducing the average SD from 0.063 to 0.026 m³ m^-3. This procedure requires no additional soil sampling and is recommended for field applications of the DPHP technique.

Abbreviations: , volumetric water content • _DPHP, mean soil volumetric water content measured by the dual-probe heat-pulse technique • _SS, mean soil volumetric water content measured by soil sampling • AWG, American Wire Gauge • C, soil volumetric heat capacity • DPHP, dual-probe heat-pulse

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. E. Ochsner and J. M. Baker In Situ Monitoring of Soil Thermal Properties and Heat Flux during Freezing and Thawing Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2008; 72(4): 1025 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Young, G. S. Campbell, and J. Yin Correcting Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Readings for Changes in Ambient Temperature Vadose Zone J., January 23, 2008; 7(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. DeSutter, T. J. Sauer, T. B. Parkin, and J. L. Heitman A Subsurface, Closed-Loop System for Soil Carbon Dioxide and Its Application to the Gradient Efflux Approach Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 126 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Knight, W. Jin, and G. J. Kluitenberg Sensitivity of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Method to Spatial Variations in Heat Capacity and Water Content Vadose Zone J., October 8, 2007; 6(4): 746 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Heitman, R. Horton, T. Ren, and T. E. Ochsner An Improved Approach for Measurement of Coupled Heat and Water Transfer in Soil Cells Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 872 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Ochsner, T. J. Sauer, and R. Horton Soil Heat Storage Measurements in Energy Balance Studies Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 311 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Ochsner, T. J. Sauer, and R. Horton Field Tests of the Soil Heat Flux Plate Method and Some Alternatives Agron. J., June 5, 2006; 98(4): 1005 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ren, Z. Ju, Y. Gong, and R. Horton Comparing Heat-Pulse and Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Water Contents from Thermo-Time Domain Reflectometry Probes Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Ochsner, R. Horton, G. J. Kluitenberg, and Q. Wang Evaluation of the Heat Pulse Ratio Method for Measuring Soil Water Flux Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 757 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Mori, J. W. Hopmans, A. P. Mortensen, and G. J. Kluitenberg Estimation of Vadose Zone Water Flux from Multi-Functional Heat Pulse Probe Measurements Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., April 11, 2005; 69(3): 599 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Ham and E. J. Benson On the Construction and Calibration of Dual-Probe Heat Capacity Sensors Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1185 - 1190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]