HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McVay, K. A. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McVay, K. A. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by McVay, K. A. Articles by Cabrera, M. L. Related Collections Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport Geochemical Processes Sorption/Exchange

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Anion Exchange in Saprolite

^a Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
^b 3111 Miller Plant Sciences Building, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
^* Corresponding author (kmcvay{at}ksu.edu).

Received 2 July 2003.

Many studies have shown that subsoils in the Piedmont region of the southeastern USA have anion exchange capacity (AEC) and can adsorb anions such as nitrate . Groundwater discharging to wells and streams often passes through thick layers of saprolite beneath Piedmont soils, but little is known about the AEC of saprolite. Our objective was to determine the AEC on saprolite samples collected with a split-spoon sampler during the installation of seven groundwater monitoring wells in north Georgia. Forty four samples were collected from depths ranging from approximately one to 15 m below the surface and analyzed for AEC, extractable iron, and pH. The saprolite thickness was at least 15 m at all seven sites as verified by drilling an adjacent 7.6-cm hole to bedrock. The average AEC for 37 saprolite samples was 0.80 cmol_c kg^–1. This was slightly less than half of the AEC observed in typical subsoil horizons of Piedmont soils. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.64) between saprolite AEC and iron oxide content. Taking into account the differences in thickness of the soil and saprolite, saprolite had about six times the AEC of subsoil. The expected adsorption coefficient (K_d) for NO^–₃ in saprolite was approximately 0.81 cm³ g^–1, based on the relationship between AEC and K_d. Using an estimated bulk density and saturated water content based on texture, this corresponds to a retardation coefficient (R) of 4.4. Models and remediation efforts involving NO^–₃ in shallow Piedmont groundwater need to account for anion adsorption in saprolite.

Abbreviations: AEC, anion exchange capacity • BTCs, breakthrough curves • CV, coefficient of variation • DCB, dithionite–citrate–bicarbonate