HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, T. W. Articles by Borchers, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Miller, T. W. Articles by Borchers, B. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Miller, T. W. Articles by Borchers, B. Related Collections Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR Other Pollution

SPECIAL SECTION: HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Radar Detection of Buried Landmines in Field Soils

^a Hydrology Program, Dep. of Earth & Environmental Science, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801
^b Dep. of Mathematics, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801
^* Corresponding author (hendrick{at}nmt.edu)

Received 31 January 2004.

The contrast in the dielectric constant between a landmine and the surrounding soil is one of the most important parameters to be considered when using ground penetrating radar (GPR) for landmine detection. For most geologic materials the dielectric constant lies within a range of 3 to 30, with dry sand at the lower end of this range at about 3 to 5. Nonmetallic antitank landmines have dielectric constants within a range of about 3 to 10 depending on their composition. A model was developed to predict whether or not field conditions are appropriate for use of GPR instruments. The predictions of this model were validated using GPR profiles in field soils with different soil textures at various soil water contents. Model predictions and field measurements provide convincing evidence that increasing the soil water content around a nonmetallic landmine can improve detection in sand and silt soils. However, data for the clay soils suggest that under elevated soil water conditions detection of nonmetallic landmines are not improved; instead radar images in these soils become worse with increasing soil water content. Data suggest that detection of metallic landmines also degrades with increasing soil water content in sandy soils. The field data are in agreement with the model predictions. Our experimental and model results demonstrate the great potential and the pitfalls of landmine sensors based on GPR. Knowledge of soil texture, dry bulk density, and water content are necessary to determine or predict whether soil conditions are suitable or not for GPR mine detection. The model presented here can be useful for making this determination.

Abbreviations: GICHD, Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining • GPR, ground penetrating radar

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Vereecken, S. Hubbard, A. Binley, and T. Ferre Hydrogeophysics: An Introduction from the Guest Editors Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1060 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]