VZJ sign up for citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sailhac, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marquis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sailhac, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marquis, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sailhac, P.
Right arrow Articles by Marquis, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Other Geophysical Methods
Right arrow Infiltration
Published in Vadose Zone Journal 3:1200-1206 (2004)
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

SPECIAL SECTION: HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Electrical Streaming Potential Measured at the Ground Surface

Forward Modeling and Inversion Issues for Monitoring Infiltration and Characterizing the Vadose Zone

Pascal Sailhac*, Mathieu Darnet and Guy Marquis

Eacute;quipe de Proche Surface, École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre–Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg (CNRS UMR7516) 5, rue René Descartes– F-67084 Strasbourg (FRANCE)
* Corresponding author (pascal.sailhac{at}eost.u-strasbg.fr)

Received 30 January 2004.

Field estimation of the soil water flux has direct application for water resource management. Standard methods like tensiometry or time domain reflectometry are often difficult to use because of subsurface heterogeneity, whereas noninvasive tools such as electrical resistance tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or ground penetrating radar are limited to the estimation of the water content. We present an electrical method that provides water flux estimates: streaming potential (SP) monitoring. This cost-effective tool may help to estimate the nature of the flow process (infiltration or evaporation) in the vadose zone. We discuss interpretation strategies in terms of numerical modeling of both hydraulic and electric processes in the vadose zone and propose an inversion scheme that allows the soil hydraulic parameters to be estimated from in situ infiltration experiments.

Abbreviations: EK, electrokinetic • SP, streaming potential




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de FranceHome page
T. W.J. van Asch, J.-P. Malet, L. P.H. van Beek, and D. Amitrano
Techniques, issues and advances in numerical modelling of landslide hazard
Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, March 1, 2007; 178(2): 65 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
H. Vereecken, S. Hubbard, A. Binley, and T. Ferre
Hydrogeophysics: An Introduction from the Guest Editors
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1060 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.