| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), ENAC-ISTE-LPE, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
b University of Tuebingen, Center for Applied Geosciences, Sigwartstr. 11, Tuebingen
c Currently, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Cassie Bldg., Rm. B3.14, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
* Corresponding author (patrick.hoehener{at}epfl.ch)
Received 23 February 2004.
Modeling the gas exchange flux between soil and the atmosphere, risk assessment, and the evaluation of remediation strategies at contaminated sites require the knowledge of gas-phase diffusivities in the subsurface. We review methods to measure the tortuosity factor or the effective gas-phase diffusion coefficient in situ. The strong dependency of these parameters on the structure and volume of the air-filled pore space in the subsurface calls for an accurate and robust in situ measurement. A variety of approaches have been proposed during the last decades, each based on the observation and interpretation of gaseous tracer diffusion in near-surface soils or the deeper vadose zone under various initial and boundary conditions. We briefly describe the conceptual basis and experimental setup of each method and give insight into error propagation. We then discuss 115 effective diffusion coefficients De compiled from the original method papers and applications. In situ methods and laboratory measurements on undisturbed soil cores yield comparable results. The Penman relationship, De/Dm = 0.66
a, sets an upper limit for the field-determined effective diffusion coefficient in the case of uniform porosity. The Moldrup relationship, De/Dm = 2.5a/t, originally proposed for sieved and repacked soils, gave the best predictions of several porosity-based relationships, but the relative deviation between observed and predicted De can be substantial. Therefore, the application of such a relationship for the site-specific modeling of gas-phase diffusion should be justified with in situ measurements, especially in heterogeneous environments.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. A. Blank, A. G. Hunt, and T. E. Skinner A Numerical Procedure to Calculate Hydraulic Conductivity for an Arbitrary Pore Size Distribution Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 461 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. Weeks and P. B. McMahon Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from Cultivated Areas and Rangeland: U.S. High Plains Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2007; 6(3): 496 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kawamoto, P. Moldrup, P. Schjonning, B. V. Iversen, D. E. Rolston, and T. Komatsu Gas Transport Parameters in the Vadose Zone: Gas Diffusivity in Field and Lysimeter Soil Profiles Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1194 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bohy, L. Dridi, G. Schafer, and O. Razakarisoa Transport of a Mixture of Chlorinated Solvent Vapors in the Vadose Zone of a Sandy Aquifer: Experimental Study and Numerical Modeling Vadose Zone J., April 27, 2006; 5(2): 539 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. E. Turcu, S. B. Jones, and D. Or Continuous Soil Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen Measurements and Estimation of Gradient-Based Gaseous Flux Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1161 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
