HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dragila, M. I. Articles by Weisbrod, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dragila, M. I. Articles by Weisbrod, N. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Dragila, M. I. Articles by Weisbrod, N. Related Collections Preferential Flow Analytical Solutions

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Flow in Menisci Corners of Capillary Rivulets

^a Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 3017 Agriculture and Life Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97370, USA
^b Department of Environmental Hydrology and Microbiology, Zuckerberg Inst. of Water Research, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
^* Corresponding author (maria.dragila{at}oregonstate.edu)

Received 25 December 2003.

Liquids that flow in unsaturated rock fractures exhibit a range of behavior distinct from flow within the porous matrix. Flow patterns observed in laboratory experiments include aperture-spanning droplets, snapping and continuous capillary threads or rivulets, islands of local saturation, and fingering. Knowledge of the contact area and flow rate for each mode is necessary to achieve successful modeling of the fracture–matrix solute transfer. A geometric model for a rivulet cross section that includes the shape of the curved meniscus between the two walls of a fracture is used in this paper to calculate (i) the flow rate within the menisci corners, (ii) a critical flow rate that determines whether a rivulet will snap or be continuous, and (iii) the width of the wetted contact against a fracture wall. For low flow rates that are near the critical value between snapping and continuous conditions, the contact area was found to be up to 18 times greater than that predicted using a simpler rectangular geometry for the rivulet cross section. A wider contact area also suggests a slower mean flow and larger time constant for solute transfer.