|
|
||||||||
a Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Center for Multiphase Environmental Research, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
b Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844
* Corresponding author (flury{at}mail.wsu.edu)
Received 11 May 2004.
Fiberglass wicks are frequently used to sample pore water and determine water fluxes in soils. In this study we evaluated the performance of fiberglass wicks to sample colloids. Different colloids were used for the wick testing: feldspathoids, ferrihydrite, montmorillonite, kaolinite, and a mixture of mineral colloids extracted from a coarse calcareous sediment. The colloids were dispersed in either a buffered Na2CO3NaHCO3 solution (ionic strength 6.7 mM, pH 10) or deionized water. Colloid breakthrough curves through 77-cm-long fiberglass wicks were determined for three different flow rates. Flow rate, pH, and colloid type affected colloid breakthrough. Colloid recovery in the effluent was higher at pH 10 than at pH 7, and increased with increasing flow rate. The mixture of mineral colloids extracted from sediment moved almost conservatively through the wicks; the colloid recoveries ranged from 88 to about 100% for pH 7 and 10, respectively. Ferrihydrite at pH 10 moved conservatively, with recoveries ranging from 95 to about 100%. All other colloids, however, showed lower mass recoveries. At pH 10, colloid recovery ranged from 55% for montmorillonite to about 100% for ferrihydrite and the mixture of mineral colloids, whereas at pH 7, the recovery ranged from <5% for kaolinite and ferrihydrite to approximately 100% for the mixture of mineral colloids. These results suggest that for certain conditions and colloid types, fiberglass wicks can be an acceptable tool for colloid sampling in the vadose zone. However, under many conditions studied here colloids were significantly retained inside the wicks, and consequently, the use of wicks for colloid sampling in the vadose zone must be considered with caution.
Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Weihermuller, J. Siemens, M. Deurer, S. Knoblauch, H. Rupp, A. Gottlein, and T. Putz In Situ Soil Water Extraction: A Review J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1735 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ilg, E. Ferber, H. Stoffregen, A. Winkler, A. Pekdeger, M. Kaupenjohann, and J. Siemens Comparing Unsaturated Colloid Transport through Columns with Differing Sampling Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 12, 2007; 71(2): 298 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Shira, B. C. Williams, M. Flury, S. Czigany, and M. Tuller Sampling Silica and Ferrihydrite Colloids with Fiberglass Wicks under Unsaturated Conditions J. Environ. Qual., May 31, 2006; 35(4): 1127 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||