HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herbst, M. Articles by Vereecken, H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Herbst, M. Articles by Vereecken, H. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Herbst, M. Articles by Vereecken, H. Related Collections Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies Pesticides Coupled Flow/Transport Models

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Intercomparison of Flow and Transport Models Applied to Vertical Drainage in Cropped Lysimeters

^a Agrosphere Institute ICG-IV, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
^b Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres, BRGM, Avenue Claude Guillemin F 45060 Orleans Cedex 02, France
^c ISRN\DPRE\SERLAB\LMODE, CEN Cadarache 13115 St Paul-Lez-Durance, France
^d Laboratoire d'etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE (UMR CNRS 5546, UJF, INPG, IRD), BP53, 38041, Grenoble CX 09, France
^* Corresponding author (m.herbst{at}fz-juelich.de)

Received 30 April 2004.

Models predicting flow and transport in the vadose zone differ in their conceptual approach, their complexity, and their mathematical formulation. Four models (MARTHE, TRACE, ANSWERS, and MACRO), which differ significantly in their model concepts and complexity, were applied to a common data set to evaluate and compare the different model approaches. Five free-draining lysimeters, cropped with winter wheat, barley, and oat were used to monitor actual evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and drainage for 627 d. One of the five lysimeters was also treated with methabenzthiazuron (MBT), and soil residues as well as leaching were experimentally determined. In Europe, MBT has been commonly used as a herbicide for almost 30 years. Generally, the use of given model inputs is recommended, apart from plant parameters, which need calibration. The use of validation criteria revealed proper simulation of water flow for the four models. After calibration, the Richards' equation–based models MARTHE, TRACE, and MACRO performed better for water flow predictions than the capacity-based ANSWERS. A small amount of preferential flow, which is not included in the model structures of MARTHE, TRACE, and ANSWERS, did not influence the simulation of water flow significantly. But preferential flow was associated with the leaching of 0.0059% of the applied mass of MBT, causing relevant concentrations in the leachate. Leaching could be described well with MACRO after calibration. The difficulty of estimating parameters for modeling macropore transport is seen as an obstacle to common application.