HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, S. B. Articles by Or, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jones, S. B. Articles by Or, D. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Jones, S. B. Articles by Or, D. Related Collections Water Content Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR Irrigation

SPECIAL SECTION: SOIL WATER SENSING

Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors

Part 1. Methodology

^a Dep. of Plants, Soils and Biometerology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
^b University of Connecticut, Dep. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Storrs, CT
^* Corresponding author (scott.jones{at}usu.edu)

Received 28 September 2004.

Performance differences in the growing number of electromagnetic (EM) sensors designed to estimate soil water content from a variety of indirect measurements (e.g., from measured travel time, capacitance, frequency shift) suggests the need for a standardized sensor characterization methodology. We suggest that characterization and evaluation of EM sensors, which currently lack citable standards, be performed in a homogeneous fluid of known permittivity rather than in a porous medium of unknown permittivity. Our objectives were to (i) develop a methodology for evaluating EM sensor measurement attributes referencing sensor-specific characteristics and targeted soil properties and (ii) suggest standards for characterization and comparison of sensors. Criteria for qualitative assessment of sensors include determination of effective measurement frequency; susceptibility to variations in salinity, dielectric relaxation, and temperature; and a look at spatial variation in sensor sampling area. Measurement frequencies for broadband sensors can be inferred from correlated network analyzer and sensor measurements or from manufacturer suggestions. Fluids were selected to provide surrogate soil-related effects such as relaxation occurring both within and outside of the effective measurement frequency range of common sensors. Test conditions included dielectrically relaxing (R) and nonrelaxing (NR) as well as electrically conducting (C) and nonconducting (NC) liquids and combinations thereof (e.g., NR-C). No suitable combination of relaxing and conducting (R-C) dielectric fluid was found in this study, but this remains a goal of future work because it represents a difficult and often common condition for EM sensor measurements in soils containing contributors to relaxation (e.g., clays, organic matter). Standards are based on fluids of known (based on Cole–Cole parameters) or measurable (using a network analyzer) frequency dependent permittivity that provide a reproducible homogeneous system for immersion of EM sensors. The methodology described here was applied using seven different EM sensing systems, and results are given in a companion paper.

Abbreviations: ATLCC, Arbitrary Transmission Line Calculator • C, conducting • EM, electromagnetic • NC, nonconducting • NR, nonrelaxing • R, relaxing • TDR, time domain reflectometry • TDT, time domain transmissometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Evett and G. W. Parkin Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Robinson, T. J. Kelleners, J. D. Cooper, C. M. K. Gardner, P. Wilson, I. Lebron, and S. Logsdon Evaluation of a Capacitance Probe Frequency Response Model Accounting for Bulk Electrical Conductivity: Comparison with TDR and Network Analyzer Measurements Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 992 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Blonquist Jr., S. B. Jones, and D. A. Robinson Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of Seven Sensing Systems Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1059 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]