HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seyfried, M. S. Articles by Humes, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Seyfried, M. S. Articles by Humes, K. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Seyfried, M. S. Articles by Humes, K. Related Collections Other Geophysical Methods Soil Physics

SPECIAL SECTION: SOIL WATER SENSING

Dielectric Loss and Calibration of the Hydra Probe Soil Water Sensor

^a USDA-ARS, 800 Park Blvd, Plaza IV, Boise, ID 83712
^b Boise State Univ
^c Univ. of Idaho
^d Univ. of Idaho
^* Corresponding author (mseyfrie{at}nwrc.ars.usda.gov)

Received 1 October 2004.

Widespread interest in soil water content (, m³ m^–3) information for both management and research has led to the development of a variety of soil water content sensors. In most cases, critical issues related to sensor calibration and accuracy have received little independent study. We investigated the performance of the Hydra Probe soil water sensor with the following objectives: (i) quantify the inter-sensor variability, (ii) evaluate the applicability of data from two commonly used calibration methods, and (iii) develop and test two multi-soil calibration equations, one general, "default" calibration equation and a second calibration that incorporates the effects of soil properties. The largest deviation in the real component of the relative dielectric permittivity determined with the Hydra Probe using 30 sensors in ethanol corresponded to a water content deviation of about 0.012 m³m^–3, indicating that a single calibration could be generally applied. In layered (wet and dry) media, _r^' determined with the Hydra Probe was different from that in uniform media with the same water content. In uniform media, was a linear function of _r^'. We used this functional relationship to describe individual soil calibrations and the multi-soil calibrations. Individual soil calibrations varied independently of clay content but were correlated with dielectric loss. When applied to the 19-soil test data set, the general calibration outperformed manufacturer-supplied calibrations. The average difference, evaluated between _r^' = 4 and _r^' = 36, was 0.019 m³m^–3 for the general equation and 0.013 m³m^–3 for the loss-corrected equation.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval • CV, coefficient of variability • DI, deionized • TDR, time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Robinson, C. S. Campbell, J. W. Hopmans, B. K. Hornbuckle, S. B. Jones, R. Knight, F. Ogden, J. Selker, and O. Wendroth Soil Moisture Measurement for Ecological and Hydrological Watershed-Scale Observatories: A Review Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 358 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Seyfried and L. E. Grant Temperature Effects on Soil Dielectric Properties Measured at 50 MHz Vadose Zone J., October 8, 2007; 6(4): 759 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Evett and G. W. Parkin Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Blonquist Jr., S. B. Jones, and D. A. Robinson Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of Seven Sensing Systems Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 1059 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]