| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Dep. of Soil and Water, China Agric. Univ. Beijing, China 100094
b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
* Corresponding author (rhorton{at}iastate.edu)
Received 29 September 2004.
The thermo-time domain reflectometry (thermo-TDR) technique provides a valuable tool for monitoring coupled heat, water, and chemical transport in the vadose zone. This study evaluated the heat-pulse and the TDR methods for soil water content determination using the thermo-TDR probe. Laboratory measurements were conducted on repacked and undisturbed soil columns of different bulk densities and water contents. For the heat-pulse method, the bulk specific heats of soil solids were determined using the thermo-TDR probe on oven-dried soil samples, and volumetric soil water content (
HP) was estimated from the heat capacity and water content relationship. For TDR measurements, the first reflection point on the waveform was determined by shorting the probe in air and the apparent probe length was determined from calibration in distilled water. The Topp equation was applied to convert the apparent relative permittivity to soil water content (TDR). The thermo-TDR probe is ideal for making the comparison between the heat pulse and TDR methods because the probe makes both measurements on nearly the same soil volume (approximate radius of 14 mm about the central heater for HP and approximate radius of 11 mm about the central cylinder for TDR). Experimental results on eight soils showed that both TDR and heat-pulse methods gave reliable soil water content data for repacked and undisturbed soil. Comparing with gravimetrically measured volumetric water content, the root mean square error (RMSE) of TDR measurements was 0.023 m3 m–3 for repacked soils and 0.018 m3 m–3 for undisturbed soils. The RMSE of HP measurements was 0.022 m3 m–3 for repacked soils and 0.021 m3 m–3 for undisturbed soils. The relatively large RMSE of the TDR measurements is attributed to the relatively short length (4-cm) of the thermo-TDR probe. The TDR method showed less sensitivity to spatial soil variability than did the heat-pulse method. The heat-pulse technique seemed better suited than TDR for water content measurements on soils with relatively high organic matter content.
Abbreviations: EC, electrical conductivity • RMSE, root mean square error • TDR, time domain reflectometry
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. L. Heitman, R. Horton, T. Ren, I. N. Nassar, and D. D. Davis A Test of Coupled Soil Heat and Water Transfer Prediction under Transient Boundary Temperatures Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1197 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Knight, W. Jin, and G. J. Kluitenberg Sensitivity of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Method to Spatial Variations in Heat Capacity and Water Content Vadose Zone J., October 8, 2007; 6(4): 746 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Heitman, R. Horton, T. Ren, and T. E. Ochsner An Improved Approach for Measurement of Coupled Heat and Water Transfer in Soil Cells Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 872 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Evett and G. W. Parkin Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
