VZJ Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 November 2005
Published in Vadose Zone J 4:1119-1122 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0023
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Water Content

NOTES

Estimating Surface Soil Moisture from Soil Color Using Image Analysis

Magnus Persson*

Dep. of Water Resources Engineering, Lund Univ., Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
* Corresponding author (magnus.persson{at}tvrl.lth.se)

Received 11 February 2005.

In this technical note the ability to estimate surface soil moisture ({theta}) from soil color using image analysis is evaluated. Four natural soils and uniform fine sand were used. Calibration soil samples with {theta} varying from 0 to 0.40 m3 m–3 in 0.05 m3 m–3 increments were prepared and photographed. The variations in soil color with {theta} were investigated in both the RGB (red, green, and blue) and HSV (hue, saturation, and value) color spaces. Generally, all tested soils became darker when wetted up to a certain limit (around 0.25 m3 m–3). However, many soils actually became lighter again at the highest {theta} levels. This was due to that some water was visible on the soil surface causing reflections. A simple linear regression model between S and V was selected to estimate {theta} from the soil color. The model performed excellent in the fine sand and in two natural soils with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.011 to 0.017 m3 m–3. In the two other soils the RMSE was about 0.025 m3 m–3. An independent validation data set was also collected for the sand. The calibrated model performed well also in the validation data set with a RMSE of 0.015 m3 m–3. From the limited data presented in this study, it seems that the relationship between soil color and {theta} is stronger in light colored soils with low organic matter content. Some examples of practical applications of the method are also suggested in the paper.

Abbreviations: HSV, hue, saturation, and value • RGB, red, green, and blue




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. R. Evett and G. W. Parkin
Advances in Soil Water Content Sensing: The Continuing Maturation of Technology and Theory
Vadose Zone J., November 11, 2005; 4(4): 986 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.