VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 March 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:296-307 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0033
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mohanty, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Das, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mohanty, B. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Das, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mohanty, B. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Remote Sensing

SPECIAL SECTION: FROM FIELD- TO LANDSCAPE-SCALE VADOSE ZONE PROCESSES

Root Zone Soil Moisture Assessment Using Remote Sensing and Vadose Zone Modeling

Narendra N. Das and Binayak P. Mohanty*

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2117
* Corresponding author (bmohanty{at}tamu.edu)

Received 6 March 2005.

Soil moisture is an important hydrologic state variable critical to successful hydroclimatic and environmental predictions. Soil moisture varies both in space and time because of spatio-temporal variations in precipitation, soil properties, topographic features, and vegetation characteristics. In recent years, air- and space-borne remote sensing campaigns have successfully demonstrated the use of passive microwave remote sensing to map soil moisture status near the soil surface ({approx}0–0.05 m below the ground) at various spatial scales. In this study root zone (e.g., {approx}0–0.6 m below the ground) soil moisture distributions were estimated across the Little Washita watershed (Oklahoma) by assimilating near-surface soil moisture data from remote sensing measurements using the Electronically Scanned Thinned Array Radiometer (ESTAR) with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) technique coupled with a numerical one-dimensional vadose zone flow model (HYDRUS-ET). The resulting distributed root zone soil moisture assessment tool (SMAT) is based on the concept of having parallel noninteracting streamtubes (hydrologic units) within a geographic information system (GIS) platform. The simulated soil moisture distribution at various depths and locations within the watershed were compared with measured profile soil moisture data using time domain reflectometry (TDR). A reasonable agreement was found under favorable conditions between footprint-scale model estimations and point-scale field soil moisture measurements in the root zone. However, uncertainties introduced by precipitation and soil hydraulic properties caused suboptimal performance of the integrated model. The SMAT holds great promise and offers flexibility to incorporate various data assimilation techniques, scaling, and other hydrological complexities across large landscapes. The integrated model can be useful for simulating profile soil moisture estimation and for predicting transient soil moisture behavior for a range of hydrological and environmental applications.

Abbreviations: DOY, day of year • EnKF, ensemble Kalman filter • ESTAR, Electronically Scanned Thinned Array Radiometer • GIS, geographic information system • LULC, land use land cover • LW, Little Washita • SGP97, Southern Great Plains 1997 Hydrology experiment • SMAT, soil moisture assessment tool • SVAT, soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer • TDR, time domain reflectometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. Camporese, C. Paniconi, M. Putti, and P. Salandin
Comparison of Data Assimilation Techniques for a Coupled Model of Surface and Subsurface Flow
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2009; 8(4): 837 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
A. V.M. Ines and B. P. Mohanty
Near-Surface Soil Moisture Assimilation for Quantifying Effective Soil Hydraulic Properties under Different Hydroclimatic Conditions
Vadose Zone J., January 23, 2008; 7(1): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
D. L. Corwin, J. Hopmans, and G. H. de Rooij
From Field- to Landscape-Scale Vadose Zone Processes: Scale Issues, Modeling, and Monitoring
Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.