HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Oyelowo, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Oyelowo, L. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Oyelowo, L. Related Collections Recharge Stochastic Processes Disposal Facilities

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Incorporating Parametric Uncertainty in the Design of Alternative Landfill Covers in Arid Regions

^a Div. of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Inst., Las Vegas, NV
^b Div. of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Inst., Reno, NV
^c National Park Service, Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit, Frostburg, MD
^d Div. of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Inst., Las Vegas, NV
^e Center for Environmental Remediation and Monitoring, Desert Research Inst., Las Vegas, NV
^f Tybrin Corp., Edwards AFB, CA
^g Environmental Management, Edwards AFB, CA
^* Corresponding author (michael.young{at}dri.edu)

Received 14 September 2005.

Monte Carlo simulations and a combination of site-specific data (e.g., soil properties, climatic conditions, and native vegetation) were used to design alternative (evapotranspiration) landfill covers at Edwards Air Force Base, located near Lancaster, CA. Laboratory analyses of site soils indicated the presence of three distinct surface soils, from which statistical distributions were generated. A 10-yr climate sequence (precipitation and potential evapotranspiration) was used for the upper boundary. Potential evapotranspiration was partitioned into potential evaporation and potential transpiration using the phenology of a Mojave Desert plant community. Nearly 1000 realizations were run for each of 72 different combinations of soil type, cover thickness, and plant cover percentage. The results indicate that threshold design parameters, needed to limit deep flux to <0.5 cm yr^–1, differ based on the relationship between the K_s (saturated hydraulic conductivity) of the surface soil, cover thickness, and plant cover percentage. In the lower conductivity soils (mean K_s = 20 cm d^–1), deep flux was 0.2 cm yr^–1 for a cover thickness >80 cm with a plant cover >10%. Higher conductivity soils (K_s = 250 cm d^–1) required thicker soils covers (>100 cm) and greater plant cover (>20%) to achieve similar fluxes. In all cases, variations in both cover thickness and plant cover percentage indicated threshold values, above which incremental additions added little to cover performance. The methods developed here could be implemented at other sites where conditions are known. Designs can account for uncertainties in site parameters and contribute to improved decision making.

Abbreviations: EAFB, Edwards Air Force Base • ET, evapotranspiration • MAF, mean annual flux • PE, potential soil evaporation • PET, potential evapotranspiration • PT, potential plant transpiration