HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Olmanson, O. K. Articles by Ochsner, T. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Olmanson, O. K. Articles by Ochsner, T. E. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Olmanson, O. K. Articles by Ochsner, T. E. Related Collections Water Content Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR Other Geophysical Methods

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparing Ambient Temperature Effects on Heat Pulse and Time Domain Reflectometry Soil Water Content Measurements

^a Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
^b USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN 55108
^* Corresponding author (ochsner{at}umn.edu)

Received 16 September 2005.

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) and the heat pulse method are both used to measure soil water content. Changes in ambient temperature have been shown to affect TDR measurements, but less is known about the behavior of heat pulse sensors in response to changes in temperature. This study directly measured and compared the temperature sensitivity of the TDR and heat pulse methods. Both methods were used to estimate water content in silt loam and sand at two fixed water contents across a wide temperature range. An increase in temperature led to an increase in measured water content in most cases. Across the 40°C temperature range, changes in measured water content were generally 0.04 m³ m^–3 or less for both methods. Weighted linear regression showed that in these soils the heat pulse method exhibited greater temperature sensitivity than the TDR method, although the differences were not statistically significant. A previously proposed correction for the temperature sensitivity of the TDR method produced mixed results. The temperature sensitivity of the heat pulse method was attributed to the changes in the density and specific heat of water and specific heat of soil with respect to temperature. When the changes in these parameters were accounted for, the temperature sensitivity was eliminated in three out of four cases.

Abbreviations: TDR, time domain reflectometry • TTDR, thermo-time domain reflectometry

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. H. Young, G. S. Campbell, and J. Yin Correcting Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Readings for Changes in Ambient Temperature Vadose Zone J., January 23, 2008; 7(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]