HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Metselaar, K. Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Metselaar, K. Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Metselaar, K. Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q. Related Collections Water Stress Root Growth/Water Uptake Models Agroclimatology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Shape of the Transpiration Reduction Function under Plant Water Stress

^a Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen Univ., Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands
^b Exact Sciences Dep., Esalq-Univ. of São Paulo, 13418-900 Piracicaba (SP), Brazil, currently at Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen Univ., the Netherlands
^* Corresponding author (qdjvlier{at}esalq.usp.br)

Received 30 June 2006.

Assuming transpiration to be reduced after a critical pressure head (usually chosen as –1.5 MPa or –150 m) at the root surface has been reached, transpiration rates in this so-called falling-rate phase were analyzed numerically for soils described by the van Genuchten–Mualem equations (numerical soils). The analysis was based on the differential equation describing radial flow to a single root. Numerically, the system was simulated by an implicit scheme. It is shown that, at limiting hydraulic conditions, relative transpiration (ratio between actual and potential transpiration) is equal to relative matric flux potential (ratio between actual matric flux potential and matric flux potential at the onset of limiting hydraulic conditions). Given this equality, transpiration reduction functions as a function of soil water content and as a function of time are presented for five types of analytical soils: a constant diffusivity, Green and Ampt, Brooks and Corey, versatile nonlinear, and exponential soil. While in the case of constant diffusivity, relative transpiration decreases as a linear function of water content, for the remaining four cases the decrease is a concave function of soil water content. Numerical simulations also result in a concave shape, unless the difference between water content at the onset of limiting hydraulic conditions and at permanent wilting is very small, for example, at high root densities. These discrepancies may be explained by the relative importance of a transition period between the constant- and falling-rate phases.