VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 January 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:140-148 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0103
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanderborght, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vanderborght, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vanderborght, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Solute Transport Models
Right arrow Dispersion
Right arrow Vadose Zone Risk Assessment
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

One-Dimensional Modeling of Transport in Soils with Depth-Dependent Dispersion, Sorption and Decay

Jan Vanderborght* and Harry Vereecken

Agrosphere, ICG-IV Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D 52425 Jülich, Germany
* Corresponding author (j.vanderborght{at}fz-juelich.de)

Received 21 July 2006.

Macroscopic spatial variations in advection velocity lead to an increase in dispersion with increasing travel distance or depth. In soils, this increase goes along with a decrease in decay and sorption of organic substances. We used three different one-dimensional models that make different assumptions about the dispersion process to compare predicted leaching in a 1-m-deep soil profile with layers with different sorption and decay parameters. The first two convective–dispersive models assume that dispersion results from microscopic variations in solute particle velocities that are not correlated across soil layer boundaries. The third model, a stream tube model (STM), assumes that the particle velocity remains constant along its trajectory and is perfectly correlated in different layers. The three models were parameterized to predict the same inert tracer breakthrough curve (BTC) at 1-m depth. The first convective–dispersive model assumes a constant dispersion coefficient ("homogeneous" convection–dispersion equation [CDE]). The second model uses different dispersion coefficients in the different layers ("layered" CDE) to predict the same inert tracer BTCs as the STM at the layer boundaries. Despite similar predictions of inert tracer BTCs, the models predicted different BTCs of reactive substances at 1-m depth. The different predictions by the STM and layered CDE illustrate the importance of the correlation of solute particle velocities in different soil layers. They also point to a fundamental problem related to the use of a CDE with a depth-dependent dispersion to mimic a dispersion process caused by macroscopic variations in particle velocities.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curve • CDE, convection–dispersion equation • STM, stream tube model







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.