VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 January 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:149-157 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0114
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhong, L.
Right arrow Articles by Deng, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Redox Processes
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Uranium Immobilization by Hydrogen Sulfide Gaseous Treatment under Vadose Zone Conditions

Lirong Zhonga,*, Edward C. Thorntona and Baolin Dengb

a Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA 99354
b Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

* Corresponding author (lirong.zhong{at}pnl.gov)

Received 15 August 2006.

Mobility of hexavalent uranium [U(VI)] in H2S-treated soils was investigated using laboratory column experiments to assess the potential of applying in situ gaseous reduction for U immobilization in the vadose zone. Soil from the Hanford Formation in the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site, Washington, was used in this study. The impact of water chemistry and soil treatment on U(VI) immobilization and the role of gas humidity on soil treatment were investigated. The study revealed that soil uptake of U(VI) from deionized water was much higher than that from the simulated Hanford groundwater. Nevertheless, gas-treated soil was still shown to have the potential for immobilizing U(VI) from the simulated groundwater. In addition, changes in H2S column breakthrough indicated that humidity enhanced the reduction of soil Fe. In the first 20 pore volumes, the soil treated with moisturized H2S gas can effectively immobilize >80% of the mobile U(VI). Primary mechanisms for U immobilization included U(VI) sorption to the sediments, reduction of U(VI) to insoluble U(IV), and enhanced adsorption of U(VI) to newly formed Fe oxides. Remobilization of U following reoxidation of the sediment was relatively insignificant under the experimental conditions applied, apparently owing to the enhanced adsorption of U to poorly crystallized hydrous ferric oxide products.

Abbreviations: DIW, deionized water • HFO, hydrous ferric oxide • ISGR, in situ gaseous reduction • KPA, kinetic phosphorescence analyzer • PRB, permeable reactive barrier • PV, pore volume • SGW, simulated groundwater




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
E. C. Thornton, L. Zhong, M. Oostrom, and B. Deng
Experimental and Theoretical Assessment of the Lifetime of a Gaseous-Reduced Vadose Zone Permeable Reactive Barrier
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2007; 6(4): 1050 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.