VZJ sign up for citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 November 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:849-854 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0049
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hangen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gerke, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hangen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gerke, H. H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hangen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gerke, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Nonequilibrium Flow
Right arrow Soil Physics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Field Measurements of Air and Water Pressures in a Heterogeneous Forest-Reclaimed Lignitic Mine Soil

Edzard Hangena,* and Horst H. Gerkeb

a Dep. of Preventive Soil Protection and Soil Monitoring, Bavarian Environment Agency, Hans-Högn Strasse 12, 95030 Hof, Germany
b Institute of Soil Landscape Research, Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Strasse 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany

* Corresponding author (edzard.hangen{at}lfu.bayern.de).

Received 14 March 2007.

Soil matric and air pressures can significantly affect each other especially if the soil-gas phase becomes disconnected from the atmosphere. Such effects were presumed to be one possible explanation for observed preferential flow patterns in a mine soil. The objective of this study was to evaluate interactions between soil-air and water pressures in situ under field conditions. In a 2.5-m-wide mine soil pit, nine soil air pressure probes were horizontally installed 27 cm apart in a row at 80 cm depth and augmented by two rows of tensiometers, one row 10 cm below and one row 10 cm above the air probes. Field data were recorded for 3 wk in autumn 2001. At two of the nine measurement positions, deviations of soil air from atmospheric pressure were observed. Solely at these two positions, water-saturated conditions were found and drainage could be collected using a cell lysimeter, indicating that these air probes were disconnected from aboveground air. After accounting for soil temperature effects, the fluctuations in soil air pressure were found to correspond with those of the ambient soil water pressure during infiltration events. The gradual decrease of soil air pressure after the event might be induced by suction effects of draining soil water in the flow finger with the soil water pressures remaining above the air entry pressure of the soil. Results suggest that effects of flow on soil air pressure can occur locally. In this heterogeneous mine soil, the air–water pressure interactions were restricted to soil regions that coincided with preferential flow paths.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.