HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Yin, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Yin, J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Young, M. H. Articles by Yin, J. Related Collections Soil Methods/Instrumentation Soil Hydrology Heat Transport

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Correcting Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Readings for Changes in Ambient Temperature

^a Desert Research Institute, Nevada System of Higher Education, Las Vegas, NV 89119
^b Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA 99163; J. Yin, Dep. of Geoscience, Univ. of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154
^* Corresponding author (michael.young{at}dri.edu).

Received 16 January 2007.

We examined three methods of analyzing dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) data for estimating volumetric water content of near-surface materials where diurnal temperature variations can approach ± 20°C. The three methods of analyzing thermal responses include: (i) the single-point method (SPM); (ii) a method that uses a Levenburg–Marquardt optimization of thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, and drift in ambient temperature with subsequent calculation of water content (LM-Uncorrected); and (iii) an expansion of the LM-Uncorrected method that incorporates temperature dependencies of soil thermal conductivity and optimizes on volumetric water content, apparent needle spacing, and drift in ambient temperature during the measurement (LM-Corrected). Ambient temperature measurements were made with either a soil thermistor installed away from the DPHP sensor (SPM) or from the temperature response of the DPHP sensor itself (LM-Uncorrected and LM-Corrected). Methods were tested based on measurements made in April and August 2006 from sensors installed at ground surface in the Mojave Desert. The SPM results showed that large (summertime) diurnal temperature variations led to significant oscillations of water content, recorded as high as ± 0.10 m³ m^–3. The LM-Uncorrected method showed a significant reduction in water content oscillations, but variations were still large. The LM-Corrected method showed that the time series of water content was significantly smoother than uncorrected water contents (i.e., ± 0.005 m³ m^–3 in August). The DPHP-derived water contents compared favorably to data from water content reflectometers installed nearby. The results show that soil water content estimates from the LM-Corrected method were substantially less affected by large ambient temperature variations.

Abbreviations: DPHP, dual-probe heat-pulse • LM, Levenburg–Marquardt • SPM, single-point method

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kamai, G. J. Kluitenberg, and J. W. Hopmans Design and Numerical Analysis of a Button Heat Pulse Probe for Soil Water Content Measurement Vadose Zone J., March 5, 2009; 8(1): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]