HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hansen, T. M. Articles by Nielsen, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hansen, T. M. Articles by Nielsen, L. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Hansen, T. M. Articles by Nielsen, L. Related Collections Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR Tomography Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation

SPECIAL SECTION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Inferring the Subsurface Structural Covariance Model Using Cross-Borehole Ground Penetrating Radar Tomography

^a Univ. of Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 28, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ea, Denmark
^b Univ. of Copenhagen, Geological Institute, Oester Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
^* Corresponding author (tmh{at}gfy.ku.dk).

Received 29 September 2006.

We address a fundamental problem inherent in least squares based ground penetrating radar tomography problems, and linear inverse Gaussian problems in general: how should the a priori covariance model be chosen? The choice of such a prior covariance model is most often a very subjective task that has major implications on the result of the inversion. We present a method that allows quantification of the likelihood that a given choice of prior covariance model is consistent with the observed tomography data. This is done by comparing statistical properties of samples of the prior and posterior probability density function of the tomographic inverse problem. In essence, if samples of the posterior are unlikely samples of the prior, then such a choice of a priori covariance model is deemed unlikely. This enables one to quantify the consistency of a number of equally probable prior covariance models to data observations. A synthetic data set was used to describe and validate the approach. We determined how a known covariance model could be inferred from a synthetic tomography problem. The methodology was then applied to a nonlinear ground penetrating radar tomography case study. The covariance model deemed most likely was consistent with nearby ground penetrating radar reflection profiles. The method provides useful results even if just a subset as small as 10% of the available data is considered.

Abbreviations: GPR, ground penetrating radar • HPD, highest probability density • McMC, Markov chain Monte Carlo • pdf, probability density function

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Lambot, A. Binley, E. Slob, and S. Hubbard Ground Penetrating Radar in Hydrogeophysics Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 137 - 139. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Cordua, M. C. Looms, and L. Nielsen Accounting for Correlated Data Errors during Inversion of Cross-Borehole Ground Penetrating Radar Data Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 263 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]