HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cordua, K. S. Articles by Nielsen, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cordua, K. S. Articles by Nielsen, L. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Cordua, K. S. Articles by Nielsen, L. Related Collections Downhole/Borehole Methods Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR Tomography

SPECIAL SECTION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN HYDROGEOPHYSICS

Accounting for Correlated Data Errors during Inversion of Cross-Borehole Ground Penetrating Radar Data

Dep. of Geography and Geology, Univ. of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
^* Corresponding author (ln{at}geol.ku.dk).

Received 14 January 2007.

Least-squares tomographic inversion of cross-borehole ground penetrating radar (GPR) data was used to estimate the radar wave velocity distribution in the upper 10 m of the vadose zone at a field site in northern Zealand, Denmark. The radar wave velocities were transformed to values of water saturation and formed a basis for hydrologic studies of flow characteristics of the vadose zone. Cross-borehole GPR data are likely to be contaminated by correlated data errors that may give rise to significant artifacts in the inverse estimate of the velocity distribution if they are not properly accounted for during the inversion process. We analyzed two sources of correlated data errors (unknown cavities and small-scale clay-enriched zones close to the borehole walls), which we assumed to play a significant role in the cross-borehole GPR data sets collected at our field site. The correlated errors may be accounted for by specification of data error covariance matrices, which are included as a priori knowledge in the inverse operator used in the tomographic algorithm. The study indicates that proper accounting for correlated data errors significantly suppresses the effects of these data errors and results in trustworthy inverse estimates of the radar wave velocities between the boreholes. Suppression of the influence of the correlated data errors is a necessity for obtaining realistic hydrologic models of the vadose zone. Using popular inverse methods that disregard the data error correlation properties can lead to severe artifacts in the inverse model estimate and, therefore, can lead to incorrect hydrologic interpretations. Our findings are based on both synthetic tests and a real data example.

Abbreviations: GPR, ground penetrating radar

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Lambot, A. Binley, E. Slob, and S. Hubbard Ground Penetrating Radar in Hydrogeophysics Vadose Zone J., February 25, 2008; 7(1): 137 - 139. [Full Text] [PDF]