VZJ sign up for etocs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 January 2008
Published in Vadose Zone J 7:31-38 (2008)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0025
© 2008 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fujimaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fujimaki, H.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Salinity
Right arrow Root Growth/Water Uptake Models

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Parameter Estimation of a Root Water Uptake Model under Salinity Stress

Haruyuki Fujimakia,*, Yoshitake Andoa, Yibin Cuib and Mitsuhiro Inouec

a Univ. of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
b School of the Environment, Nanjing Univ., Nanjing 210093, China
c Arid Land Research Center, Tottori Univ., 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-8550, Japan

* Corresponding author (fujimaki{at}sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp).

Received 30 January 2007.

Accurate prediction of root water uptake under salinity stress contributes to efficient water management in arid and semiarid lands. We present a cost-effective and reliable method to determine parameter values in a widely used macroscopic root water uptake model. We conducted column experiments using soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in a greenhouse. Six columns with one plant each were used: three were under salinity stress, the others provided potential transpiration. Three time-domain reflectometry probes were inserted into each of the three columns to observe water content and electrical conductivity. In the daytime, the soil surface was covered to prevent evaporation. Weight of the columns was manually measured to obtain daily transpiration. After the stress period, root density distributions were obtained by dismantling the columns. Two parameter values were inversely determined by minimizing the sum of square difference between observed and calculated daily transpiration rates. Water uptake at each depth and time was calculated by substituting linearly interpolated osmotic potential into a stress response function. Optimized daily transpiration agreed well with the observations. In Addition, deviation in the three optimized response functions was small at low-to-moderate stress, indicating the reliability of the method.

Abbreviations: EC, electrical conductivity • RWU, root water uptake • TDR, time domain reflectometry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2008 by the Soil Science Society of America.