HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Iwata, Y. Articles by Hirota, T. PubMed Articles by Iwata, Y. Articles by Hirota, T. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Iwata, Y. Articles by Hirota, T. Related Collections Flow Infiltration Hydraulic Conductivity

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Snowmelt Infiltration under Different Soil-Freezing Conditions Influenced by Snow Cover

^a National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Sinsei, Memuro, Hokkaido, 082-0081 Japan
^b Dep. of Geoscience, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
^c National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Hitsujigaoka 1, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 062-8555 Japan
^* Corresponding author (iwatayuk{at}affrc.go.jp).

Received 9 May 2007.

The depth of soil frost is decreasing in cold regions around the world as a result of climate warming. To evaluate the potential impacts of the reduction in frost depth on the hydrologic cycle, it is necessary to understand snowmelt infiltration processes in frozen soils. A field study was conducted at an agricultural site characterized by volcanic ash soil in Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan, where frost depths have decreased significantly in the last 20 yr. Soil temperature, water content, matric potential, snow cover, and meteorological parameters were monitored to quantify snowmelt infiltration flux for four winters that had different snow and soil conditions. When snowmelt began, the soil frost was 0.1 to 0.2 m thick in two winters and was absent in two other winters, providing a unique opportunity to compare snowmelt infiltration under frozen and unfrozen conditions. Most of the snowmelt water infiltrated into the soil under both frozen and unfrozen conditions, indicating that the frozen soil layer did not impede infiltration. The lack of flow impedance in the frozen soil was partly due to relatively high air temperature and an absence of freeze-back events during the snowmelt period. Furthermore, the temperature of the frozen soil layer was close to 0°C when the melt started, meaning that very little meltwater refroze in the soil before the temperature reached 0°C. The thick (>1 m) snow cover insulated the soil surface, allowing the frozen soil layer to warm up with the upward conduction of heat from the unfrozen layer below. These results indicate the importance of the interaction between snow cover and soil, which can be significantly affected by climate change.

Abbreviations: SWE, snow water equivalent • WCR, water content reflectometer