HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Papadopoulos, A. Articles by Whitmore, A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Papadopoulos, A. Articles by Whitmore, A. P. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Papadopoulos, A. Articles by Whitmore, A. P. Related Collections Structure and Properties Fractal Approaches Scaling

SPECIAL SECTION: MULTISCALE MAPPING

Fractal Analysis of Pore Roughness in Images of Soil Using the Slit Island Method

^a Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, Univ. of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
^b Agriculture and the Environment Division, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ, UK
^* Corresponding author (nigel.bird{at}bbsrc.ac.uk).

Received 16 January 2007.

A description and quantification of the surface of soil pores is important to promote our understanding of soil function because these surfaces provide sites for biological, chemical, and physical processes within the soil. Previous attempts to characterize the geometry of pore surfaces have included the slit island method, which is used to extract a fractal dimension to describe the roughness of the pore perimeters in two dimensions. Our objective in this study was to assess how this approach might be robustly applied to images of soil pore structure. Critical to the success of the technique is constancy of shape in the set of pores analyzed. We applied additional analysis to test whether this criterion is met, using the convex cover and the convexity of a two-dimensional object. This additional analysis coupled with the slit island method was applied to a soil image. In this instance, we were unable to detect a set of pores of common shape and concluded that the fractal dimension of value 1.4 derived from the image reflects not a fractal pore perimeter but rather an increasing complexity of pore shape with increasing pore size. We concluded that the analysis of pore shape proposed here, in addition to scaling of pore perimeter, is critical to sensibly describe the geometry of soil pore perimeters.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. D. Logsdon, E. Perfect, and A. M. Tarquis Multiscale Soil Investigations: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Techniques Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 453 - 455. [Full Text] [PDF]