HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vrugt, J. A. Articles by Vesselinov, V. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Vrugt, J. A. Articles by Vesselinov, V. V. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Vrugt, J. A. Articles by Vesselinov, V. V. Related Collections Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation Soil Physics Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

SPECIAL SECTION: VADOSE ZONE MODELING

Inverse Modeling of Subsurface Flow and Transport Properties: A Review with New Developments

^a Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545
^b Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545
^c Lincoln Environmental Research, Ruakura Research Center, Hamilton, New Zealand
^d Civilian Nuclear Program Office, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545
^* Corresponding author (vrugt{at}lanl.gov).

Received 23 April 2007.

Many of the parameters in subsurface flow and transport models cannot be estimated directly at the scale of interest, but can only be derived through inverse modeling. During this process, the parameters are adjusted in such a way that the behavior of the model approximates, as closely and consistently as possible, the observed response of the system under study for some historical period of time. We briefly review the current state of the art of inverse modeling for estimating unsaturated flow and transport processes. We summariz how the inverse method works, discuss the historical background that led to the current perspectives on inverse modeling, and review the solution algorithms used to solve the parameter estimation problem. We then highlight our recent work at Los Alamos related to the development and implementation of improved optimization and data assimilation methods for computationally efficient calibration and uncertainty estimation in complex, distributed flow and transport models using parallel computing capabilities. Finally, we illustrate these developments with three different case studies, including (i) the calibration of a fully coupled three-dimensional vapor extraction model using measured concentrations of volatile organic compounds in the subsurface near the Los Alamos National Laboratory, (ii) the multiobjective inverse estimation of soil hydraulic properties in the HYDRUS-1D model using observed tensiometric data from an experimental field plot in New Zealand, and (iii) the simultaneous estimation of parameter and states in a groundwater solute mixture model using data from a multitracer experiment at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

Abbreviations: CPU, central processing unit • EnKF, ensemble Kalman filter • GDPM, generalized dual-porosity model • KF, Kalman filter • LANL, Los Alamos National Laboratory • MDA, Material Disposal Area • MPI, message passing interface • MVG, Mualem–van Genuchten • PFBA, pentafluorobenzoate • RTD, residence time distribution • SLS, simple least squares • SVE, soil vapor extraction • VOC, volatile organic compound

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Simunek and S. A. Bradford Vadose Zone Modeling: Introduction and Importance Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 581 - 586. [Full Text] [PDF]