HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Poulsen, T. G. Articles by Blendstrup, H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Poulsen, T. G. Articles by Blendstrup, H. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Poulsen, T. G. Articles by Blendstrup, H. Related Collections Flow Air Permeability Pedotransfer Functions Dual Porosity/Permeability Models

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Predicting Air Permeability in Porous Media with Variable Structure, Bulk Density, and Water Content

Section for Environmental Engineering, Dep. of Chemistry, Biotechnology, and Environmental Engineering, Aalborg Univ., Sohngaardsholmsvej 57, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
^* Corresponding author (tgp{at}bio.aau.dk).

Received 15 February 2008.

Air permeability in unstructured porous media can often be predicted directly from air-filled porosity based on one or two measurements of air permeability at different air-filled porosities using existing predictive models. In structured media and media that change their physical characteristics (bulk density, water content, organic matter content, etc.) with time, the relationship between air permeability and air-filled porosity is often very complex and consequently models for predicting air permeability in such media are not yet well established. We developed a simple model concept for predicting air permeability in porous media with variable structure. Predictions are based on water content, air-filled porosity, and dry bulk density and the model uses a very limited set of input data. The model is able to predict air permeability throughout the entire water content–bulk density domain. A set of four measurements of air permeability at different values of water content and dry bulk density is required as input. The model was tested against a set of air permeability data from six porous materials (a total of 236 measurements) representing a wide range of material types, organic matter contents, water contents, and dry bulk densities. Excellent agreement between measured and predicted air permeability values was found except at very low values of air permeability for some of the materials.