VZJ Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 10 February 2009
Published in Vadose Zone J 8:108-118 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2008.0074
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Goswami, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clement, T. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Data acquisition and assimilation
Right arrow Experiment Design

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Estimating Errors in Concentration Measurements Obtained from Image Analysis

R. R. Goswamia,c, B. Ambaleb and T. P. Clementa,*

a Dep. of Civil Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
b Dep. of Electrical Engineering, Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
c current address: Geosyntec Consultants, Boca Raton, FL 33487

* Corresponding author (clement{at}auburn.edu).

Received 23 March 2008.

Image analysis (IA) techniques are increasingly being used in porous media experiments to measure system properties such as concentration and water content. The values of system properties estimated using IA techniques can be influenced by various types of experimental errors. These errors are generally quantified by using global mass balance calculations or by comparing the dispersion coefficient value obtained from the IA data against an accepted value. We used a theoretical test problem to show that both of these error quantification methods have severe limitations. Hence, we developed an alternative statistics-based method for quantifying IA errors. The applicability of the new method was verified using the theoretical test problem. In addition to quantifying errors, the method can also be used as a design tool for selecting optimal concentration ranges for conducting contaminant transport experiments with minimal errors. We conducted a dense-tracer transport experiment to demonstrate the use of the proposed error analysis method.

Abbreviations: CRE, calibration-relationship error • EE, experimental error • IA, image analysis • LTM, light transmission method







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.