HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martínez, F. S. J. Articles by Rawls, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Martínez, F. S. J. Articles by Rawls, W. J. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Martínez, F. S. J. Articles by Rawls, W. J. Related Collections Soil Hydrology Solute Transport Models Dispersion

SPECIAL SECTION: FRACTALS

Advective–Dispersive Equation with Spatial Fractional Derivatives Evaluated with Tracer Transport Data

^a Dep. of Applied Mathematics in Agronomic Engineering, Technical Univ. of Madrid (UPM), Avd. de la Complutense s/n. 28040, Madrid, Spain
^b Environmental Microbial Safety Lab., USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
^c Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
^* Corresponding author (fernando.sanjose{at}upm.es).

Received 15 February 2008.

The classical model used to describe solute transport in soil is based on the advective–dispersive equation (ADE) in which an analog of Fick's law is used to model dispersion. The fractional ADE (FADE) has been proposed to address discrepancies between experimental solute concentrations and those predicted with the ADE. The order of the fractional derivative or Lévy exponent, , characterizes the deviation of the FADE solutions from the ADE, which is a specific case of the FADE for = 2. The objective of this work was to test the hypothesis that using the FADE with values of other than 2 can provide more accurate simulations of solute transport in soils. We fitted the FADE to 47 published data sets on tracer breakthrough in disturbed and undisturbed soil columns. The FADE was solved numerically with a mass-conserving boundary condition. While 19 breakthrough curves were best fitted with the ADE, the rest were fitted better using the FADE with < 2. The RMSEs of the FADE and ADE were close when the FADE was >1.5. In contrast, the FADE RMSEs were, on average, 1.5 times smaller than the ADE RMSE when the FADE was fitted with < 1.5. The value of apparently reflected the structure of the void space available for flow and transport. Considered as a generalization of the classical ADE, the FADE can be a useful model if tails of the breakthrough curve are of special interest.

Abbreviations: ADE, advective–dispersive equation • FADE, fractional advective–dispersive equation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Perfect, Y. Pachepsky, and M. A. Martin Fractal and Multifractal Models Applied to Porous Media Vadose Zone J., March 5, 2009; 8(1): 174 - 176. [Full Text] [PDF]