HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by van den Berg, E. H. Articles by Donat, R. W. PubMed Articles by van den Berg, E. H. Articles by Donat, R. W. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by van den Berg, E. H. Articles by Donat, R. W. Related Collections Soil Methods/Instrumentation Hydraulic Conductivity/Relative Permeability Variably Saturated Fluid Flow

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS

Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements with Centrifuges: A Review

Dep. of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Univ. of Tennessee, 1412 Circle Dr., Knoxville, TN 37996-1410
^* Corresponding author (eperfect{at}utk.edu).

Received 4 August 2008.

Conducting drainage or imbibition experiments in a centrifugal force field has long been recognized as a valid and efficient way to determine capillary pressure–saturation and relative permeability–saturation relationships. Experiments involving multiphase flow of immiscible fluids in porous media are sped up because the centrifugal acceleration is many times greater than Earth's gravitational acceleration. In addition, the fact that centrifugal force is a body force and that experiments can be performed under well-controlled conditions are considered advantages over other techniques. During the past few decades, transient-flow centrifuge methods have been developed and applied in petroleum geosciences, while in the soil and environmental sciences the focus has been on steady-state centrifuge methods. To inform both groups of each others' work, the different instrumental approaches used are described. The theoretical background for modeling multiphase fluid flow of immiscible fluids through porous media in a centrifugal force field is then reviewed. This background forms the basis for understanding analytical and numerical formulations to interpret both steady-state and transient-flow centrifuge experiments. Research on the effects of compaction, menisci deformation, boundary conditions, corrections for early-time production data, the selection of measurable variables, and nonuniqueness of the data interpretation is discussed. A numerical example application of the transient-flow centrifuge method is presented. Finally, the major conclusions that can be drawn from the literature are discussed and potential areas for future research are identified.

Abbreviations: IFC, internal flow control • UFA, unsaturated flow apparatus