VZJ Download to Citation Manager
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 7 July 2009
Published in Vadose Zone J 8:548-556 (2009)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2008.0089
© 2009 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.-P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chung, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.-P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chung, C.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, C.-P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR
Right arrow Soil Physics

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Apparent Dielectric Constant and Effective Frequency of TDR Measurements: Influencing Factors and Comparison

C.-C. Chung and C.-P. Lin*

Dep. of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan
* Corresponding author (cplin{at}mail.nctu.edu.tw).

Received 8 May 2008.

When measuring soil water content by time domain reflectometry (TDR), several methods are available for determining the related apparent dielectric constant (Ka) from the TDR waveform. Their influencing factors and effective frequencies have not been extensively investigated and results obtained from different methods have not been critically compared. The purpose of this study was to use numerical simulations to systematically investigate the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion on Ka and the associated effective frequency. Not only does the dielectric dispersion significantly affect the measured Ka, it also plays an important role in how Ka is affected by the electrical conductivity and cable length. Three methods for determining Ka were compared, including the dual tangent, single tangent, and derivative methods. Their effective frequencies were carefully examined with emphasis on whether the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion can be accounted for by the estimated effective frequency. The results show that there is no consistent trend between the change in Ka and the change in effective frequency as the influencing factors vary. Compensating the effects of electrical conductivity, cable length, and dielectric dispersion by the effective frequency seems theoretically infeasible. To improve the accuracy of TDR soil water content measurements in the face of these influencing factors, future studies are recommended toward TDR dielectric spectroscopy or developing signal processing techniques for determining the dielectric permittivity near the optimal frequency range.

Abbreviations: EC, electrical conductivity • TDR, time domain reflectometry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the Soil Science Society of America.