VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Suarez, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Sorption/Exchange
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Constant Capacitance Model Computation of Boron Speciation for Varying Soil Water Content

P. J. Vaughan* and D. L. Suarez

George E. Brown, Jr. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, CA 92507


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effective Kd decreases with decreasing gravimetric water content ({theta}g) for saline water composition. Numbers represent textures given in Table 2.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Variation of H+ concentration and electrical conductivity (EC) with gravimetric water content ({theta}g) for saline water composition. Calculated H+ concentration was not affected by variations in soil texture.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Variation of pH with gravimetric water content ({theta}g) for saline water composition.

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effective Kd at {theta}g = 1.5 vs. the intrinsic equilibrium constant K-, for saline water composition.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Tetrahedral surface B species (SH3BO-4) vs. {theta}g for saline water composition. Numbers represent textures given in Table 2.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Total solution B represented as H3BO3 vs. {theta}g for saline water composition. Numbers represent textures given in Table 2.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effective Kd vs. {theta}g for Soil Texture 1, 60% clay. The three lines represent three different water compositions but identical initial total B.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.