VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bagarello, V.
Right arrow Articles by Iovino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bagarello, V.
Right arrow Articles by Iovino, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bagarello, V.
Right arrow Articles by Iovino, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Infiltration

Field Testing Parameter Sensitivity of the Two-Term Infiltration Equation Using Differentiated Linearization

Vincenzo Bagarello and Massimo Iovino*

Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Tecnologie Agro-Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Facoltà di Agraria, Viale delle Scienze, 90128, Palermo, Italy


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the experiment sites.

 




View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Application of the differentiated linearization (DL) method to the field data obtained in Exp. (a) 5L, (b) 8L, and (c) 6TI. The straight line was obtained by regression of the increasing linear part of the {Delta}I/{Delta} vs. data.

 



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Application of the differentiated linearization (DL) method to the field data obtained in Exp. (a) 13L and (b) 2TI.

 



View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cumulative infiltration, I, vs. square root of time, , for Exp. (a) 13L and (b) 2TI. The straight lines are the regressions of I vs. for the contact material wetting phase (dotted line) and for the phase where sorptivity of the soil dominates the flow (continuous line).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cumulative infiltration, I, vs. time, t, for Exp. 5L. The straight line was obtained by regression of the linear part of the I vs. t data.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Soil hydraulic conductivity, K0, estimate vs. duration of the experiment.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.