Multi-Functional Heat Pulse Probe for the Simultaneous Measurement of Soil Water Content, Solute Concentration, and Heat Transport Parameters
Y. Moria,
J. W. Hopmans*,b,
A. P. Mortensenc and
G. J. Kluitenbergd
a Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Shimane University, Shimane, Japan
b Hydrology, Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
c Geological Institute, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
d Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Design of multi-functional heat pulse probe (MFHPP).
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Experimentally determined temperature dependency of specific heat of the Tottori sand.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Comparison of measured with optimized matric head and cumulative outflow for the 0.06 M solution.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Optimized soil hydraulic functions. The symbols correspond with measured soil water retention data at the hydraulic equilibrium stages of Fig. 3, using the multi-functional heat pulse probe (MFHPP) and tensiometer data.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Calibration of the Wenner array of the multi-functional heat pulse probe (MFHPP) for the Tottori Dune sand.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Measured and optimized temperature response for the estimation of reff in agar solution.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Thermal responses at various soil water content values for the Tottori sand.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Estimated average soil thermal properties for the three solution concentrations compared with independent data.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. Comparison of measurements with multi-functional heat pulse probe (MFHPP) and gravimetric method. Solid circles indicate glass jar experiments; open circles denote the multistep outflow experiments.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10. Variation of with height in flow cell as determined from gravimetric (open symbols), SFOPT simulations (solid and dashed lines), and MFHPP data (solid circles) for the indicated suction values.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11. Comparison of measured (multi-functional heat pulse probe [MFHPP]) with simulated water flux (SFOPT) values in the center of the flow cell for various multistep outflow experiments.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.