VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ochsner, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ren, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ochsner, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ren, T.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ochsner, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ren, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Soil Hydrology

Use of the Dual-Probe Heat-Pulse Technique to Monitor Soil Water Content in the Vadose Zone

Tyson E. Ochsner*,a, Robert Hortonb and Tusheng Renc

a USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN 55108
b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
c Inst. of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 100101



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Calibrated needle spacing vs. maximum temperature increase for one dual-probe heat-pulse sensor in agar-stabilized water at 2 and 6 g L-1. The symbol is the mean of 10 measurements, and the error bars represent 1 SD in each direction.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Daily average of water content measured by the dual-probe heat-pulse sensors along with the daily rainfall totals for the measurement periods in (A) 2001 and (B) 2002.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. 2002 time series of water content measured by dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) sensors and by soil sampling at (A) the 7.5-cm depth and (B) the 37.5-cm depth.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. One-to-one comparison of water content measured by dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) sensors and by soil sampling at (A) the 7.5-cm depth and (B) the 37.5-cm depth. Symbols represent the mean of 12 measurements. Error bars represent 1 SD in each direction. The open symbols identify the questionable soil sampling data discussed in the text.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. 2002 time series of water content measured by dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) sensors after application of matching point procedure and by soil sampling at (A) the 7.5-cm depth and (B) the 37.5-cm depth.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. One-to-one comparison of water content measured by dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) sensors after application of matching point procedure and by soil sampling at (A) the 7.5-cm depth and (B) the 37.5-cm depth. Symbols represent the mean of 12 measurements. Error bars represent 1 SD in each direction.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.