VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Soil Thermal Properties

Errors in Heat Flux Measurement by Flux Plates of Contrasting Design and Thermal Conductivity

T. J. Sauer*,a, D. W. Meeka, T. E. Ochsnerb, A. R. Harrisc and R. Hortond

a USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Laboratory, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011-4420
b USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, St. Paul, MN 55108
c Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Drake University, Des Moines, IA 50311
d Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Predicted ratio of heat flux density through each plate to that through the soil (Gm/G) at varying soil {lambda} determined from Eq. [1].

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Average heat flux density through each type of flux plate compared with the known flux density through the sand. Error bars represent 1 SD.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Average corrected (using Eq. [1]) heat flux density through each type of flux plate compared to the known flux density through the sand.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (A) Uncorrected and (B) corrected Gm on Day 207 for pairs of four types of heat flux plate at 6 cm in Canisteo soil compared with G determined by Eq. [9].

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. H vs. {eta} as defined in Eq. [2], with H determined from the full representation and from the single term of the power series approximation described in Philip (1961).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.