VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Timlin, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Timlin, D. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Starr, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Timlin, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Infiltration
Right arrow Tillage

Using High-Resolution Soil Moisture Data to Assess Soil Water Dynamics in the Vadose Zone

James L. Starra,* and Dennis J. Timlinb

a USDA-ARS Environmental Quality Lab., Bldg. 007, 10300 Baltimore Ave., BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705
b USDA-ARS Alternate Crops and Systems Lab., Bldg. 001, Rm. 342, 10300 Baltimore Ave., BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Cumulative rainfall amount and (B) intensity distribution frequencies for the recharge and high evapotranspiration (ET) seasons during this 2.5-yr study.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Schematic of the multisensor capacitance probe showing three of four sensors.

 


View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Schematic of site layout with location of multisensor capacitance probes (MCP) in eight no tillage (NT) and plow tillage (PT) plots. The enlarged area shows the MCP placement positions in the two intensively instrumented plots.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil water dynamics around an irrigation event at four sensor depths under plow tillage and no tillage corn, at a row position. Total water added was 41 mm.

 


View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Dynamics of soil water storage (5–55 cm) in side-by-side plow tillage (PT) and no tillage (NT) plots, at the nontraffic interrow position, in this 2.5-yr study. The horizontal lines in 1995 represent the approximate water holding capacities for NT and PT.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Cumulative soil water storage vs. rainfall, by (a) no tillage (NT) vs. plow tillage (PT) and (b) recharge vs. high evapotranspiration (ET) season.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Tillage differences in cumulative storage [no tillage (NT) – plow tillage (PT)] vs. (a) rainfall amount and (b) rainfall intensity. Each value in the plot represents a difference between mean cumulative storage values for a tillage treatment.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.