VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flyhammar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flyhammar, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Flyhammar, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR
Right arrow Soil Physics

Time-Domain Reflectometry Probe for Water Content and Electrical Conductivity Measurements in Saline Porous Media

Magnus Perssona,*, David Bendzb and Peter Flyhammara

a Department of Engineering Geology, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
b Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Hospitalsgatan 16A, 211 33 Malmö, Sweden



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic design of the time-domain reflectometry (TDR) coated–uncoated probe (CUP). The total length of the stainless steel rods is 0.30 m and the separation distance between the other two rods is 0.04 m.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) waveforms collected during the measurements in the KBr solutions using two coated–uncoated probes (CUP2 and CUP3). The waveforms are taken at three different levels of electrical conductivity: (a) 0.015, (b) 2.00, and (c) 8.95 dS m–1. The + signs indicate the end reflection of the probe estimated by the wave analysis software.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The measured dielectric constant from the coated part of CUP1 and CUP2 (Kap), CUP3 and CUP4 (Kak), and from the uncoated part of all CUPs (Ku) plotted against the electrical conductivity of the KBr solutions. The solid line represents the predicted Kw according to Eq. [1]. CUP, coated–uncoated probe.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The measured dielectric constant from the coated part of CUP2 (Kap) and CUP3 (Kak), and from the uncoated part of CUP2 and CUP3 (Ku2 and Ku3) plotted against the water content during the upward infiltration experiments. The solid line represents the best-fit, third-order polynomial relationship between Ka and {theta} for the measurements at the lowest {sigma}a. CUP, coated–uncoated probe.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. The measured bulk electrical conductivity {sigma}a during the three upward infiltration experiments (+, {sigma}w = 0.01; {diamond}, {sigma}w = 6.31; {circ}, {sigma}w = 12.03 dS m–1) measured with the uncoated parts of two coated–uncoated probes (CUP2 and CUP3).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.