VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Titov, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Titov, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Titov, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vereecken, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Induced Polarization of Unsaturated Sands Determined through Time Domain Measurements

K. Titova,b,*, A. Kemnac, A. Tarasovd and H. Vereeckenc

a Russian Institute of Exploration Geophysics, 20 Fayansovaya St., 193019, St. Petersburg, Russia
b Presently, St. Petersburg State University, Geophysical Department, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia
c Agrosphere Institute (ICG-IV), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany
d State Enterprise, Geologorazvedka, 17 Knipovich St., 193019, St. Petersburg, Russia



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic view of IP in ion-conductive rocks (according to Fridrikhsberg and Sidorova, 1961; Dukhin and Derjaguin, 1974; Dukhin and Shilov, 1974). (a) Scheme of electrical double layer at a negatively charged particle surface; {alpha}, ß, and {gamma} denote solid phase, Helmholtz layer, and diffuse layer, respectively. (b) Schematic distribution of cation (Cc) and anion (Ca) concentrations in the EDL; C0 is the equilibrium ion concentration outside the EDL. (c) Excess and deficiency in ion concentration around a polarized charged spherical particle; dotted arrows indicate the local diffusion flows represented by both cations and anions, dashed arrows show the local diffusion flows near the solid surface mostly represented by cations, solid arrow shows the electric field direction. (d) Excess and deficiency in ion concentration along a polarized throat; diffusion flows and electric field same as in Part c. (e) Schematic distribution of the ion concentration around a polarized spherical particle or along a polarized pore throat; C* denotes the excess concentration produced by the polarizing electric field.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (a, c, e) Schematic view of polarizing cells based on the granular model and (b, d, f) equivalent pore sketches for dense (right) and loose (left) packings of particles at different water content: (a, b) full saturation, (c–f) partial saturation. Gray and white areas indicate water and particles, respectively. In the saturated case (a, b), water-filling intergrain spaces can be considered large pores. Areas of grain contact, where the water is in a closer bond on the grain surface, can be considered throats. In the partially saturated case (c, d), the water film at the surface of moistened grains can be considered a narrow passageway for electric current (throats). Areas of grain contact, where water is more abundant because of surface tension (water "rings"), can be viewed as large passageways (similar to large pores in the saturated case). With further desaturation, cells continuously loose water from the grain contact area and both thickness and diameter of the water rings decrease (e, f).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Schematic view of a "slit" sequence representing interconnected (a) saturated and (b) unsaturated pores. For the saturated case (a) a1, a2 denote the half-apertures of narrow and large slits, respectively; for the unsaturated case (b) a2 denotes the characteristic thickness of the water film in a large slit; {delta} denotes the Debye length. Symbolic graphs of ion concentrations illustrate excess of cations and deficiency of anions in the electrical double layer (EDL) relative to the equilibrium concentration C0. The integrals of cation excess and anion deficiency over the slit aperture represent the effective charges of cations ({alpha}+) and anions ({alpha}) in the EDL.

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Difference in cation transparency for a sequence of large and narrow slits with apertures a2 and a1, respectively (Eq. [12]). The graphs were calculated for different ratios of the Debye length to the aperture of the narrow slit ({delta}/a1) and for a value of {phi}1 potential of 0.1 V. The difference in cation transparency strongly increases when a2/a1 is in the region between 3 and 30. Lower graphs, corresponding to a narrow slit with an aperture 1000 and 10000 times larger than the Debye length, can be attributed to saturated cells (Fig. 1a and 1b). Upper graphs, corresponding to a narrow slit with an aperture 10 and 100 times larger than the Debye length, can be attributed to unsaturated cells (Fig. 1c–1f).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Differential polarizability vs. time for (a) quartz–water–air (QWA) and (b) quartz–water–kerosene (QWK) samples for different volumetric water contents. Numbers on the graphs show the values of volumetric water content. Each curve is plotted on the basis of 59 data points evenly spaced on log scale. Note the similarity of relationships for QWA and QWK samples.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Chargeability vs. volumetric water content (W) for quartz–water–air (open symbols) and quartz–water–kerosene (solid symbols) samples. Notice the maximum type behavior of the relationship, with a maximum occurring at W = 0.08.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Resistivity vs. volumetric water content (W) for quartz–water–air (open symbols) and quartz–water–kerosene (solid symbols) samples. Solid lines show a power-law fit to the data for the two identified regions. The power-law exponent was found to be 0.21 for W < 0.08, and 1.3 for W > 0.08.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Normalized chargeability vs. volumetric water content (W) for quartz–water–air (QWA) (open symbols) and quartz–water–kerosene (QWK) (solid symbols) samples. Power-law fits to the data are shown by the dotted (QWA samples) and the dashed (QWK samples) lines, respectively. Numbers show the corresponding power-law exponents. The solid curve indicates the supposed behavior of normalized polarizability.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.