Transport and Time Lag of Chlorofluorocarbon Gases in the Unsaturated Zone, Rabis Creek, Denmark
Peter Engesgaarda,*,
Anker L. Højbergb,
Klaus Hinsbyb,
Karsten H. Jensena,
Troels Laierb,
Flemming Larsenc,
Eurybiades Busenbergd and
L. Niel Plummerd
a Geological Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
b Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
c Environment and Resources, Technical Univ. of Denmark, Building 204, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
d USGS, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, USA

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Physical and chemical processes affecting CFC transport in the unsaturated zone.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Measured and reconstructed (a) CFC-11, (b) CFC-12, and (c) CFC-113 concentration curves for the atmosphere at monitoring stations in Ireland (solid line) and USA (dashed line). Two different measurements of the atmospheric CFC concentrations at the Rabis Creek study site are included.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Measured water content in the unsaturated zone (June 1995). The mean water content is approximately 6%.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Simulated results for daily depth-averaged water content and yearly infiltration rate.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Measured and simulated distributions of CFCs in the unsaturated zone. Note the small range in concentration scale. Horizontal lines connect replicate analyses of separate ampoules.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Simulated (numerical as solid line and displaced by time lag as solid-dot) CFC concentrations at the water table beneath a 16-m-thick unsaturated zone at the Rabis Creek site compared with atmospheric concentrations (Colorado, USA).
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Simulated time lag for 1983 atmospheric CFC-11 concentration as a function of steady infiltration qw. Two cases of constant water content are shown: w = 0.1 and 0.15. The corresponding simulated time lag for nonsteady infiltration is 4.7 yr. The analytical time lag under linear atmospheric increase in concentration is 5.2 yr.
|
|
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.