VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yao, T.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yao, T.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yao, T.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, S. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Content
Right arrow Soil Hydrology
Right arrow Field-Scale Studies

Neutron Probe Calibration in a Vertically Stratified Vadose Zone

T. Yaoa,*, P. J. Wierengaa, A. R. Grahama and S. P. Neumanb

a Soil Water and Environmental Science Dep., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
b Hydrology and Water Resources Dep., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721



View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Monitoring Locations 1 through 9 for Exp. 1 and 2.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Neutron probe count ratio profile at Monitoring Location 6, 6 d before Exp. 1. The dashed lines represent the texture boundaries by count ratio (CR): for sand, CR < 1.1; for loamy sand, CR 1.1–1.25; for sandy loam, CR > 1.25.

 


View larger version (60K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil texture, neutron probe count ratio (CR), and water content (WC) data at nine monitoring locations. There were no samples below 2 m for Sites 8 and 9. Samples were taken after 3 yr of redistribution, before the first irrigation experiment. (Samples taken every 25 cm except at the 225-cm depth.)

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Water content vs. count ratio at the nine monitoring locations for the upper 2.5 m of soils. Triangles are sand, squares are loamy sand, and diamonds are sandy loam. The dashed line was fitted through all data. The calibration lines obtained by Young et al. (1999) and Thomasson (2001) are also shown.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water content vs. count ratio for sandy loam, loamy sand, sand, and their corresponding least squares fitted straight lines.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Total water measured in the soil for the top 10 m using one layer (triangle), two-layer (cross), three-layer (square), and three-layer plus interface (circle) calibrations vs. the cumulative applied water (bold line) at all nine monitoring locations during Exp. 2. Between Days 6 and 20, mean RMSE values for the soil measured, using one-layer, two-layer, three-layer, and three-layer plus interface calibration equations, vs. surface applied water are 0.095, 0.067, 0.071, and 0.039 m water, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.