VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurtado, A. L. B.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hurtado, A. L. B.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hurtado, A. L. B.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong van Lier, Q.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity
Right arrow Soil Hydrology

Uncertainty of Hydraulic Conductivity under Field Conditions and at Fixed Pressure Heads and Water Contents

A. L. B. Hurtado and Q. de Jong van Lier*

Department of Exact Sciences, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of (A) coefficients of determination and (B) standard deviations at each depth after fitting the van Genuchten {theta}(h) equation to experimental data from the 24 sampling locations.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Equation [1] fitted to Hz data from the uncovered experiment at Location 12 for each observation time: (a) 0 h, (b) 17.9 h, (c) 47.7 h, (d) 65.1 h, (e) 88.5 h, (f) 114.4 h, (g) 137.8 h, (h) 163.8 h, (i) 186.8 h, (j) 211.5 h, (k) 282.6 h, and (l) 401.4 h.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Equation [3] fitted to zZFP–t data from the uncovered test at Location 12.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Experimentally obtained values of the hydraulic conductivity K as a function of the water content {theta} from both covered and uncovered experiments, at three locations at the 0.075-m depth, together with regression lines.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Experimentally obtained values of the hydraulic conductivity K as a function of the water content {theta} from both the covered and uncovered experiments, at three locations at the 0.375-m depth, together with regression lines.

 


View larger version (51K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Values of {theta} and h for which hydraulic conductivity was obtained in the covered and uncovered experiment, at each location.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Coefficients of variation of h (CVh) as a function of {theta} and coefficients of variation of {theta} (CV{theta}) as a function of h at the 0.075- and 0.375-m depths, obtained from 24 {theta}(h) relations.

 


View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Box plots for untransformed and lognormal-transformed data of K{theta} at both depths.

 


View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Box plots for untransformed and lognormal-transformed data of Kh at both depths.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Coefficients of variation of Kh and K{theta} from untransformed (squares) and lognormal-transformed (circles) data, at both depths, as a function of h or {theta}, and weighed mean . Numbers indicate the number of locations with an observation of K at a particular h or {theta}

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.