VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 August 2005
Published in Vadose Zone J 4:672-693 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2004.0176
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walther, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walther, D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Walther, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Recharge
Right arrow Infiltration

Development of an Infiltration Map for the Los Alamos Area, New Mexico

Edward Kwicklis*, Marc Witkowski, Kay Birdsell, Brent Newman and Douglas Walther

Los Alamos Natl. Lab., EES-6, MS T0003, Los Alamos, NM 87545


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Map of the study area with point estimates of infiltration rates (mm yr–1).

 


View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Surficial geology and structural features of the study area (modified from Cole et al., 1998).

 


View larger version (109K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Distribution of dominant vegetation types in the study area.

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Stream-gage network for the study area, with average annual stream flow volumes and incremental stream-flow losses (+) or gains (–).

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Monthly stream-flow data for gages located (a) in the upper parts of canyons that have their headwaters in the Sierra de los Valles (b) in canyons that have their headwaters on the Pajarito Plateau, and (c) in canyons where runoff is dominated either by natural runoff or by effluent.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Stream-flow losses (positive) and gains (negative) in Los Alamos Canyon as a function of stream-flow rates.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Stream flow versus precipitation in four watersheds that drain the Sierra de los Valles.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Plots showing (a) historic variations in discharge volumes from TA-35 WWTP and discharge volumes and tritium concentrations from the RLWTF in TA-50 and (b) temporal variations in TA-50 discharge and alluvial groundwater in Mortandad Canyon wells MCO-5 and MCO-6.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Pore-water tritium concentrations with depth in Mortandad Canyon Well R-15.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Estimated change in infiltration rates with time near Mortandad Canyon Well R-15.

 


View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Map of net infiltration rates for the Los Alamos area.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.