VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 November 2005
Published in Vadose Zone J 4:1004-1010 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0028
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polyakov, V.
Right arrow Articles by Ryder, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Polyakov, V.
Right arrow Articles by Ryder, M. H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Polyakov, V.
Right arrow Articles by Ryder, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation
Right arrow Water Content

Calibration of a Capacitance System for Measuring Water Content of Tropical Soil

V. Polyakov*, A. Fares and M. H. Ryder

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawaii, 1910 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Measured volumetric water content versus scaled frequency and corresponding calibration models for Ewa silty clay loam on a rangeland site.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Measured volumetric water content versus scaled frequency and corresponding calibration models for Ewa silty clay loam on a cultivated terrace site.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured volumetric water content versus scaled frequency and corresponding calibration models for all field data for the Ewa silty clay loam.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured volumetric water content versus scaled frequency and corresponding calibration models for laboratory soil and sand columns.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Comparison of calibration models developed for rangeland, cultivated terrace, combined field data, laboratory soil and sand columns, and default manufacturer equation.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The effect of temperature on volumetric water content measurement using MCS. Capacitance sensor measurement is represented as a ratio {theta}T/{theta}23, where {theta}T and {theta}23 are the soil water content at temperature T and 23°C, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.