VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 March 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:412-418 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0019
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noborio, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Noborio, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Noborio, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Time Domain Reflectometry, TDR
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Solute Transport Measurement Under Transient Field Conditions Using Time Domain Reflectometry

K. Noborioa, R. G. Kachanoskib,* and C. S. Tanc

a Iwate Univ., Morioka, Iwate 020-8550, Japan; present address, School of Agriculture, Meiji Univ., Kawasaki, Kanagawa 214-8571, Japan
b Third Floor University Hall, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2J9
c Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada N0R 1G0


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Temporal changes in (A) daily precipitation, (B) volumetric soil water content measured with vertically installed 0.2 m-long TDR probes, and (C) average soil temperature between 0.05 and 0.3m deep. Bars in (B) indicate ± one standard deviation with n = 16.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. An example of comparing TDR-measured water content at the control and KCl-applied plots. Dotted lines represent the boundaries of ±90% confidence interval.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. An example of relationship between bulk dielectric constant, {varepsilon}b, and reciprocal impedance, R–1, before KCl solution application in the control and KCl-applied plots with and without a temperature correction factor.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. An example of the relationship between bulk dielectric constant, {varepsilon}b, and the product of water content and reciprocal impedance difference, {theta}(R–1 – R0–1), to estimate {varepsilon}0. Data used were taken before the solute mass was assumed not to start leaching from the TDR probe length.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Temporal changes in relative solute mass along L = 0.2 m TDR probes (A) with a temperature correction factor and (B) without a temperature correction factor. Bars indicate ± one standard deviation with n = 8. A KCl solution was applied on Day of Year 115.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Breakthrough curves estimated as derivatives of the convective–dispersive transport (CDE) and convective lognormal transport (CLT) models fitted to the TDR-measured data with and without a temperature correction factor.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.