VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 April 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:539-553 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0079
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Razakarisoa, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bohy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Razakarisoa, O.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bohy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Razakarisoa, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Volatile Organic Compounds
Right arrow Multicomponent Transport Models
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Transport of a Mixture of Chlorinated Solvent Vapors in the Vadose Zone of a Sandy Aquifer

Experimental Study and Numerical Modeling

Martine Bohy, Lotfi Dridi, Gerhard Schäfer* and Olivier Razakarisoa

Institut de Mécanique des Fluides et des Solides de Strasbourg, Institut Franco-Allemand de Recherche sur l'Environnement (IFARE), UMR 7507 ULP-CNRS, 23 rue du Loess, BP 20, F-67037 Strasbourg Cedex, France

Figure 1
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of the SCERES facility showing the pollution source and the sampling locations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Measured and simulated relative water saturation profiles and sampling depths in the vadose zone of SCERES.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured TCE and PCE vapor concentrations at (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m) and (X = 0.75 m; Y = 0 m), at depths of (a) 0.25 m and (b) 1.7 m.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. TCE and PCE water concentrations measured at (X = 0 m; Y = –0.75 m) at depths of 1.85 and 1.95 m.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Evolution of the TCE and PCE fluxes measured at different distances from the source on the flow axis.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Observed vapor phase concentration profiles in the unsaturated zone of the SCERES aquifer.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Measured and analytically calculated TCE and PCE volatilization rates from the soil surface.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Schematics of the computational grid used in the numerical simulation.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Relative permeabilities of the water and gas phases used in the simulations.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Observed and simulated (a) TCE and (b) PCE gas concentrations at (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m) at depths of 0.25 and 1.7 m (sim = simulated, meas = measured).

 

Figure 11
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Simulated and measured dissolved TCE and PCE concentrations at (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m) at a depth of 1.85 m.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Measured, analytically calculated (Fickian_based) and numerically simulated volatilization rates into the atmosphere at (X = 1.5 m; Y = 0 m).

 

Figure 13
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13. Sensitivity analysis: Influence of the source zone definition on calculated gaseous concentrations at (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m).

 

Figure 14
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14. Sensitivity analysis: influence of (a) source zone definition and (b) the adsorption coefficient on calculated aqueous concentrations at (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m).

 

Figure 15
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15. Sensitivity analysis: influence of average temperature on calculated vapor concentrations at point (X = 0 m; Y = 0.75 m).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.