VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 26 May 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:757-763 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2005.0116
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, J. W.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, J. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electromagnetic Induction, EMI
Right arrow Urban Soils
Right arrow Other Environmental Contamination

Electrical Conductivity of a Failed Septic System Soil Absorption Field

Brad D. Leea,*, Byron J. Jenkinsona, James A. Doolittleb, Richard S. Taylorc and J. Wes Tuttled

a Agronomy Dep., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
b USDA-NRCS-NSSC, 11 Campus Blvd., Suite 200, Newton Square, PA, 19073
c Dualem Inc., 540 Churchill Ave., Milton, ON, Canada L9T 3A2
d USDA-NRCS-NSSC, P.O. Box 60, Wilkesboro, NC 28697


Figure 1
View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Topographic survey of study site. Vertical exaggeration is 10-fold. Septic system components were identified on soil surface or by tile probe.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of ECa collected with the DUALEM-2 along a north–south traverse under the following conditions: (A) December 2001 (wet soil moisture condition), perpendicular (PRP) geometry; (B) December 2001, horizontal coplanar (HCP) geometry; (C) July 2002 (dry soil moisture condition), PRP geometry; and (D) July 2002, HCP geometry.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Two-dimensional depiction of apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) along transect x–x' (line 20 east, south to north). The septic system absorption field had a greater ECa under both the wet soil moisture conditions of the December 2001 survey and dry soil moisture conditions of the July 2002 survey.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Unweighted average saturated paste electrical conductivity (ECsat) to 1.2-m depth relative to the measured apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) collected in the perpendicular orientation (1-m depth) along three transect lines. In all transects, ECa was lower than ECsat.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) between the apparent electrical conductivity measured in the perpendicular geometry (1-m depth) relative to the average saturated paste electrical conductivity measured to a depth of 1.2 m.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.