VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 24 August 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:934-950 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0021
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sully, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sully, M. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kwicklis, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sully, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Flow Models
Right arrow Multiphase Fluid Flow
Right arrow Animal Waste

Multiphase, Multicomponent Parameter Estimation for Liquid and Vapor Fluxes in Deep Arid Systems Using Hydrologic Data and Natural Environmental Tracers

Edward M. Kwicklisa, Andrew V. Wolfsberga,*, Philip H. Stauffera, Michelle A. Walvoordb and Michael J. Sullyc

a Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
b USGS, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Mail Stop 413, Lakewood, CO 80225-0046
c Neptune and Company, Inc., 1505 15th St., Suite B, Los Alamos, NM 87544

Figure 1
View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Map of the NTS showing the location of the Area 3 RWMS with waste-disposal areas and selected boreholes.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Comparison of water-potential data from the Area 3 RWMS with model results.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Comparison of pore-water delta oxygen-18 ({delta}18O) data from the Area 3 RWMS with model results.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Comparison of pore-water delta deuterium ({delta}D) data from the Area 3 RWMS with model results.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Scatterplot of delta deuterium ({delta}D) versus delta oxygen-18 ({delta}18O) data from the Area 3 RWMS.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Comparison of (a) water content and (b) saturation data from the Area 3 RWMS with model results.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Comparison of pore-water Cl concentration data from the Area 3 RWMS with model results.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 8. Pore-water chloride concentration data from Area 6.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 9. Comparison of water-potential data from Borehole UE-6s with model results.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 10. Comparison of pore-water delta deuterium ({delta}D) data from Borehole UE-6s with model results.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 11. Comparison of pore-water delta oxygen-18 ({delta}18O) data from Borehole UE-6s with model results.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 12. Scatterplot of delta deuterium ({delta}D) versus delta oxygen-18 ({delta}18O) data from Borehole UE-6s.

 

Figure 13
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 13. Comparison of simulated and measured pore-water Cl concentrations at Borehole UE-6s.

 

Figure 14
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 14. Simulated present-day liquid and vapor fluxes at the Area 3 RWMS.

 

Figure 15
View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 15. Simulated present-day liquid fluxes for 1000 Monte Carlo simulations: (a) entire vadose zone, (b) upper 80 m of vadose zone.

 

Figure 16
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 16. Simulated present-day vapor fluxes for 1000 Monte Carlo simulations: (a) entire vadose zone, (b) upper 80 m of vadose zone.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.